Marc Burban, Asian Risks Management Services

Risk management: Insurance lessons from one of China’s deadliest industrial accidents in recent years

Marc Burban, Asian Risks Management Services

July 20 2026

The explosion at a Chinese fireworks factory at the start of May is a reminder that the true value of an insurance program is tested not when a policy is purchased, but when catastrophe strikes.

The fire at the Huasheng Fireworks Manufacturing and Display Company in Liuyang, Hunan province, claimed 37 lives, injured 51 people, and caused extensive damage to the factory and surrounding communities.

As one of China’s deadliest industrial accidents in recent years, the disaster has drawn significant attention from insurers, brokers, reinsurers, risk managers, and regulators.

Beyond the human tragedy, the incident raises an important question: are insurance programs in high-hazard industries designed to withstand catastrophic losses, or merely to satisfy regulatory requirements?

While the rapid deployment of advance payments, aggregating to about CNY15 million (US$214 million) by Chinese insurers, demonstrates real progress, the unanswered questions about Huasheng’s program underline a persistent gap between regulatory compliance and genuine risk transfer.

Insurance arrangements, especially in high-hazard industries, should be designed to provide meaningful financial protection against worst-case scenarios, not merely to satisfy regulatory requirements. The adequacy of coverage becomes just as important as the speed of claims payment.

The accident

The explosion occurred at approximately 4:43pm at Huasheng’s facility in Guandu town during a period of intensive production activity.

Preliminary findings indicate that excessive quantities of pyrotechnic materials had been stored on-site and that deficiencies in electrostatic protection measures triggered a chain reaction of explosions.

The losses are expected to extend well beyond physical damage to include fatality and injury compensation, site restoration, third-party liabilities, business interruption and environmental remediation.

Insurance response

Following the accident, China’s insurance industry mobilised quickly, with PICC, Ping An, China Life Property Insurance, China Taiping, China Pacific Insurance, and Taikang all activating emergency response procedures and dispatching claims personnel to the site.

PICC announced an advance payment of CNY6 million on May 5; Ping An followed with a further CNY6 million under its safety production liability insurance program.

By the end of May, cumulative advance payments had reportedly reached CNY15 million across casualty, property and motor covers.

The speed of the payments reflects the progress Chinese insurers have made in providing immediate financial support following major disasters.

Unanswered questions

Public reports confirm that Huasheng held safety production liability insurance and property insurance.

Beyond this, significant questions remain.

It is unclear whether limits were purchased above the regulatory minimum, whether all workers, including temporary, seasonal, and outsourced staff, were properly declared, and whether business interruption, employers’ liability, public liability, or environmental liability covers were in place.

These uncertainties matter. The effectiveness of an insurance program depends not merely on the existence of coverage, but on the adequacy of limits and the overall scope of protection.

Depending on how the program was structured, a substantial portion of the ultimate loss may remain uninsured and fall directly onto the company.

This reflects a recurring challenge across high-risk industries in China: insurance programs are frequently designed to satisfy a regulator rather than the financial consequences of a worst-case scenario.

Key lessons

The first lesson concerns employee protection. In high-hazard industries, a single accident can result in multiple fatalities and serious injuries, creating compensation obligations that quickly exceed minimum insurance requirements.

While regulatory insurance provides an important foundation, companies should consider whether policy limits are sufficient to respond to a realistic worst-case scenario. When losses exceed available coverage, the financial burden ultimately falls on the employer.

The accident also highlights the growing importance of third-party liability protection. Industrial facilities that were once located in relatively isolated areas are increasingly surrounded by residential and commercial developments. As a result, a major explosion can affect not only employees, but also neighbouring residents, businesses, and property owners.

Adequate liability limits are therefore an essential component of risk management for high-hazard operations.

Business interruption is another exposure that is often underestimated. While physical damage attracts the most attention following a catastrophe, the financial impact of an extended shutdown can be equally severe.

Lost revenue, supply-chain disruption, contractual penalties, and the loss of customers may ultimately cost more than repairing damaged buildings and equipment. Business interruption coverage should therefore receive the same level of attention as traditional property insurance.

Finally, the accident demonstrates the importance of accurate workforce declarations. Industries such as fireworks manufacturing often rely on temporary, seasonal, and contract workers.

Following a major loss, questions regarding employment status and insurance enrolment can complicate claims handling, delay compensation payments, and create unexpected uninsured exposures.

Maintaining accurate records and ensuring all workers are properly covered remains a critical aspect of effective risk management.

MORE FROM: Comment
Partner Content
Join the mailing list Designed to help you stay ahead, our daily newsletter provides a round-up of the latest news and insights, delivered straight to your inbox.
Print Edition
Subscribe to receive our quarterly print magazine.