Ant Group’s woes a boon for established insurers
February 8 2021 by Raymond Barrett![](https://insuranceasianews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/shutterstock_1846304890-768x512.jpg)
With Ant Group soon to be subject to the same oversight as traditional banks, established insurers in China are likely breathing a sigh of relief that a would-be digital disrupter has been brought to heel.
Several media outlets reported this week that Ant Group, formerly known as Ant Financial, had “agreed” to restructure its credit, investment and insurance operations into a financial holding company to resolve an ongoing saga with the China Banking and Insurance and Regulatory Commission (CBIRC).
The regulator shot down the high-flying digital payment giant’s IPO in November over fears that a lightly regulated lender with access to a billion potential customers posed a systemic risk to the Chinese economy.
Jack Ma’s Alibaba and its subsidiary Ant Group had grown so quickly precisely because Beijing had exercised a light touch, but going forward the fintech giant will be subject to the same capital requirements as banks.
Ant has been building out its insurance business in recent years through its Alipay platform, mostly through the distribution of products offered by partner insurers. Ant is estimated to hold around 13% of the online insurance market and its Xiang Hu Bao mutual aid platform — which offers health protection to lower income people, especially in rural areas — is believed to have signed up at least a 100 million customers since it was launched in 2018.
The fact that the Chinese government became unwilling to tolerate a digital maverick moving into a traditionally conservative sector suggests that insurance start-ups who take a loose approach to risk management may also suffer a similar fate.
Speaking at the Asian Financial Forum this January, CBIRC chairman Guo Shuqing noted that the financial sector will be subject to “prudential regulation” in the years ahead. In addition, with the deadline for implementation of the new IFRS 17 regime fast approaching, the regulatory burden facing the insurance sector is only set to increase.
Therefore, well-capitalised insurers with extensive internal compliance and control systems may be less likely to face sudden competition from digital giants such as Tencent, Ant or smaller insurtechs.
This is likely a relief to more “old school” insurers who rely on antiquated relics such as human beings to distribute their products — insurers still employ hundreds of thousands of agents across China.
In what may be a prescient sign of the road ahead, Yin Ming, the head of Ant’s insurance unit, resigned last month after five years on the job amid uncertainties over the direction of the business.
His destination? The Beijing-based Sunshine Property and Casualty Insurance.
How very old school.
-
Opinion: The Indian insurance privatisation conundrum
- July 5
State-led revivals have delayed privatisation of the country’s three general insurers and stalled much-needed reforms and competition that could otherwise enable Indian carriers to put their stamp on the world stage.
-
Opinion: Brokers keen to see underwriters back in the market
- June 14
The post-pandemic hybrid environment and the development of AI means that queries and placements are significantly lacking in any human interaction for increasingly commoditised risks.
-
Opinion: Are risk models for Asia fit for purpose?
- May 31
There is a need for carriers to build in-house modelling capabilities as third-party offerings lack a deep understanding and awareness of emerging risk exposures in Asia Pacific, especially for secondary perils.
-
Opinion: Will Lloyd’s move really bring about the end of the cyber wordings war?
- May 20
In a bid to calm frayed nerves, Lloyd's introduced phase out dates for non-compliant covers and target dates for what the market considers to be acceptable cover for policies affirming war-related coverage.
-
Guy Carpenter | Private equity’s reshaping of the Asian life sector has further to run
PE-backed reinsurers provide access to asset classes and investment expertise that often don’t exist within the traditional carriers themselves.